Artificial Intelligence: the great leap backwards


I’ve been inspired by Darwin’s Dangerous Idea (Dennett) this week. It occurs to me that there will eventually exist a division in the history of man’s technology. The first (which we are still in) is one characterized by intentionally designed technologies. Within this category, there is still room for accident and mistake and the hazy intentionality of inspiration, but essentially there is intention at the various stages of design. Reason and its constituent helpers are guiding the process of problem solving. The next phase of design is one of detached intentionality. Let me explain. The most breathtaking and elegant designs on earth are all natural products of evolution. The designs are so perfect, efficient and elegant that we have difficulty in understanding how they work let alone replicate them. These designs were not intentionally created, but rather were algorithmically produced by a wonderful system of constraints, mutations and inheritance. It seems plausible that when we learn to harness this kind of computational power, our problem solving ability will grow exponentially. I can envision some kind of computer simulation that produces outcomes that transcend intention and hence avoid the natural impedance of typical design thinking. Much like observing many biological entities, the design path will be obscure but the design process will be understood, at least abstractly. Curiously, tools of this sort will actually be (philosophically) Darwinian inversions since nature has no real goals whereas man certainly does. Nature doesn’t desire to have a pretty flying thing and the butterfly is the design result. An evolutionary computer would be doing just that. Our current design constraints dictate certain kinds of results that are difficult to undo or even unthink when attempting to take greater leaps in design efficiency or simplicity or utility. Its a great disservice to call this kind of computing artificial intelligence when non-artificial intelligence seems like such a dullard when compared with the brilliance of nature’s unintentional algorithms.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Artificial Intelligence: the great leap backwards

  1. Boy, do you ever stink at this new friend business. No coffee no jazz – BOR – ING. Anyways, hope you were having an extended marathon date or something. Talk to you later.

  2. rainswept says:

    b’o’th’acorn – have you read House of Leaves?Nnvwi.Smvxija

  3. rainswept says:

    Also, I am amzed that artificial intelligence has come to the point where mannequins are intelligent enought to operate computers!Aozeqjb.

  4. RE: HoLI am in the initial chapters. Purchased on reccommend of M. Tron and attraction to page layout with MR gC’s from Xmas. Delayed in reading at first b/c of sudden realization of scary content. Why? Have you read much of Borges short stories, much there you would like I think.

  5. rainswept says:

    Yes have read Collected Fictions. Borges was definitely a major inspiration for MZD – Zampano is surely based on him.Lfilmlzd.

  6. rainswept says:

    Smells like xudu spirit.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s